AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingPricing

← 11.ai

11.ai — agentic threat model

8.9AIVSS 8.9 · High

11.ai presents a high-risk profile due to its integration with critical enterprise tools (Slack, Notion, Linear) via the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and its ability to execute sequential actions, compounded by its alpha-stage maturity.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.5AARS uplift 0.86Factor sum 5.7/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×0.95
Autonomy of Action
0.70
Goal-Driven Planning
0.80
Self-Modification
0.10
Dynamic Tool Use
0.80
Persistent Memory
0.50
Contextual Awareness
0.80
Dynamic Identity
0.40
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.30
Non-Determinism
0.70
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.60

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — uses multimodal/voice-first models for natural voice/text interaction, but specific foundation models are not disclosed. Vulnerable to prompt injection via voice (vishing/audio injection) and standard adversarial inputs.

L2 · Data Operations✓ mapped

Integrates with Slack, Linear, Perplexity, and Notion, creating risks of data exfiltration, unauthorized RAG retrieval, and knowledge-base poisoning from compromised connected workspaces.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

Uses Model Context Protocol (MCP) for tool orchestration and sequential action planning. Risks include insecure tool integration, tool misuse (e.g., unauthorized Slack posting or Notion modification), and MCP-specific protocol vulnerabilities.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — deployment infrastructure, sandboxing of MCP servers, and secrets management for connected integrations (Slack, Notion) are not detailed in the public listing.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — being in alpha stage suggests observability, guardrails, and logging may be immature or not fully hardened against adversarial exploitation.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — claims to connect 'securely' to tools, but specific authentication mechanisms (OAuth, API keys), authorization policies, and compliance alignments are not disclosed.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

Interacts with an ecosystem of tools (Slack, Linear, Notion) via MCP. Risks include cascading failures across connected platforms and trust abuse if a connected workspace or MCP server is compromised.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.