AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingPricing

← Agent RAI

Agent RAI — agentic threat model

8.5AIVSS 8.5 · High

Agent RAI is a closed-source enterprise automation framework focused on reasoning-driven decision-making, presenting moderate-to-high risk due to potential access to sensitive corporate data and operational workflows without visible built-in security controls.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 7.5AARS uplift 1.0Factor sum 4.0/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.50
Goal-Driven Planning
0.60
Self-Modification
0.10
Dynamic Tool Use
0.40
Persistent Memory
0.20
Contextual Awareness
0.50
Dynamic Identity
0.10
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.40
Non-Determinism
0.50
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.70

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Agent RAI likely relies on proprietary or commercial LLMs for reasoning-driven automation, which are vulnerable to prompt injection, adversarial examples, and misaligned outputs.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Enterprise decision-making implies integration with corporate data sources or vector databases, presenting risks of data exfiltration, knowledge-base poisoning, or unauthorized access to sensitive business intelligence.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — As an agent framework, it orchestrates planning and tool execution, which introduces risks of insecure tool integration, prompt injection leading to unauthorized tool calling, and state-tracking vulnerabilities.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Enterprise deployment typically involves cloud or on-premise hosting, where threats include container escape, insecure API endpoints, and credential exposure if secrets are not securely managed.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Without explicit observability features, the system may suffer from blind spots in detecting drift, adversarial inputs, or anomalous reasoning loops during enterprise operations.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Enterprise automation requires robust identity, access management, and audit trails to meet compliance standards (e.g., SOC2, GDPR), which are not detailed in the public listing.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — If deployed in a multi-agent enterprise ecosystem, there are risks of cascading failures, unauthorized agent-to-agent communication, and trust delegation issues.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.