AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingPricing

← GCS Cheats

GCS Cheats — agentic threat model

8.5AIVSS 8.5 · High

GCS Cheats is a traditional game modification tool rather than an AI agent, presenting severe host-level security risks due to its closed-source nature, potential kernel-level operations, and deliberate evasion of security controls.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 7.8AARS uplift 0.68Factor sum 2.8/10Threat ×1.1Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.80
Goal-Driven Planning
0.10
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.20
Persistent Memory
0.10
Contextual Awareness
0.60
Dynamic Identity
0.00
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.00
Non-Determinism
0.20
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.80

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — GCS Cheats is described as traditional game cheat software (aimbot, ESP, RCS) and does not appear to utilize LLMs or foundation models.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no indication of training data, RAG, vector stores, or data pipelines associated with this software.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The software uses automated targeting (aimbot) and recoil control, but there is no evidence of an LLM-based agentic orchestration framework or planning/memory tools.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The software runs locally on client machines to modify game memory/processes, posing high risks of host compromise or detection bypass, but specific infrastructure hosting details are absent.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There are no mentioned AI evaluation, logging, or guardrail mechanisms, only stealth techniques to avoid anti-cheat detection.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The software operates in a regulatory and policy gray area (violating game ToS), lacks standard compliance frameworks, and uses closed-source premium access controls.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no multi-agent coordination or marketplace integration described for this software.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.