AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingPricing

← jo

jo — agentic threat model

6.6AIVSS 6.6 · Medium

jo is a closed-source voice assistant with a low-to-moderate risk profile, primarily threatened by voice-based prompt injection and unauthorized task execution due to a lack of visible security controls.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 5.3AARS uplift 1.27Factor sum 2.7/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.40
Goal-Driven Planning
0.20
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.30
Persistent Memory
0.30
Contextual Awareness
0.40
Dynamic Identity
0.00
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.00
Non-Determinism
0.50
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.60

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely relies on proprietary or third-party speech-to-text and LLM foundation models. Primary threats include adversarial voice inputs (over-the-air injection) and prompt injection leading to unintended actions.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely processes and stores voice recordings, transcripts, and user profile data. Threats include unauthorized access to voice history and potential data exfiltration via voice channels.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — orchestration likely maps voice intents to specific daily task tools (e.g., calendars, reminders). Threats include insecure tool integration and unauthorized execution of tasks via voice commands.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely hosted in a cloud environment with mobile or web client endpoints. Threats include insecure API endpoints and lack of sandboxing for voice processing pipelines.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — no details are provided regarding guardrails, monitoring, or logging of voice interactions. Threats include blind spots in detecting malicious voice commands or prompt injections.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — closed-source nature makes compliance posture (e.g., GDPR for voice data, SOC2) unclear. Threats include lack of robust authentication for voice commands, potentially allowing unauthorized users to trigger actions.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — no indication of multi-agent interactions or marketplace integrations. Threats are minimal unless it connects to external third-party APIs for task execution.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.