AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingPricing

← Klyr

Klyr — agentic threat model

9.6AIVSS 9.6 · Critical

Klyr's risk posture is characterized by high autonomy and multi-platform write access (Slack, Discord, WhatsApp) without visible built-in security guardrails or sandboxing, making it a high-value target for prompt injection and automated social engineering.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.5AARS uplift 1.06Factor sum 6.7/10Threat ×1.05Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.80
Goal-Driven Planning
0.70
Self-Modification
0.50
Dynamic Tool Use
0.80
Persistent Memory
0.80
Contextual Awareness
0.70
Dynamic Identity
0.60
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.40
Non-Determinism
0.70
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.70

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The underlying foundation models are not specified. However, the platform's reliance on autonomous content generation and multi-platform action makes it highly vulnerable to prompt injection and model reprogramming.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — While 'synchronized memory' is highlighted, the underlying storage mechanism (e.g., vector databases) and its protections against memory poisoning or data exfiltration are not described.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

Klyr provides a proprietary no-code orchestration framework supporting planning, memory, and tool execution (web search, content generation). The primary threat is insecure tool integration and memory poisoning via malicious inputs from integrated chat platforms.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The hosting infrastructure, execution sandboxing for workflows, and secrets management for third-party API keys (Slack, Discord, WhatsApp) are not detailed.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no mention of built-in observability, execution logging, or safety guardrails to monitor and intercept anomalous agent behaviors.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Compliance alignments (e.g., SOC2, GDPR) and enterprise security controls like Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) or secure credential storage are not specified.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

Klyr functions as an agent platform where multiple deployed agents share 'synchronized memory'. This introduces risks of cross-agent trust abuse, memory contamination, and cascading failures across the workspace ecosystem.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.