AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingPricing

← Microsoft Copilot

Microsoft Copilot — agentic threat model

6.0AIVSS 6.0 · Medium

Based strictly on the limited directory listing, Microsoft Copilot acts as a productivity assistant with low apparent autonomy, but its lack of documented security controls and architectural details presents unverified risks in data handling and tool execution.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 5.0AARS uplift 1.0Factor sum 2.0/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.20
Goal-Driven Planning
0.20
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.30
Persistent Memory
0.10
Contextual Awareness
0.30
Dynamic Identity
0.00
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.00
Non-Determinism
0.40
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.50

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The specific foundation models powering this Copilot instance are not detailed in the description, but typical threats include prompt injection, adversarial manipulation, and misaligned outputs.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — No details are provided regarding data ingestion, vector databases, or RAG pipelines, leaving potential risks of data poisoning or exfiltration unverified.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The orchestration framework, memory retention mechanisms, and tool-calling capabilities are not specified, making it difficult to assess tool misuse or framework vulnerabilities.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The hosting environment, sandboxing controls, and network isolation measures are not described, leaving infrastructure-level risks unquantified.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no mention of evaluation metrics, real-time monitoring, logging, or guardrails to detect drift or malicious inputs.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Compliance alignments (such as ISO, NIST, or SOC2) and identity/access management controls are not detailed in the provided text.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The description does not indicate whether this agent interacts with other agents or operates within a broader marketplace ecosystem.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.