Midship — agentic threat model
Midship presents a high-risk profile due to its deep access to sensitive financial systems and compliance data required for SOX auditing. A compromise could allow attackers to manipulate audit evidence or exfiltrate critical corporate financial information.
OWASP AIVSS score rationale
| Autonomy of Action | 0.60 | |
| Goal-Driven Planning | 0.70 | |
| Self-Modification | 0.10 | |
| Dynamic Tool Use | 0.60 | |
| Persistent Memory | 0.50 | |
| Contextual Awareness | 0.80 | |
| Dynamic Identity | 0.50 | |
| Multi-Agent Interactions | 0.20 | |
| Non-Determinism | 0.40 | |
| Opacity & Reflexivity | 0.50 |
Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.
MAESTRO 7-layer threat model
Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.
Not certain from the listing — The specific LLMs used for parsing audit evidence and control descriptions are not disclosed, posing risks of misaligned outputs or adversarial manipulation of audit evidence.
Not certain from the listing — The agent must ingest sensitive financial records, system logs, and control documentation, raising significant data exfiltration and knowledge-base poisoning risks.
Not certain from the listing — Orchestration of multi-step audit testing procedures is required, creating risks of tool misuse or insecure integration with enterprise systems.
Not certain from the listing — Hosting details are omitted, but secure sandboxing and credential storage are critical given the agent's access to sensitive enterprise environments.
Not certain from the listing — Monitoring for drift or hallucinated audit findings is crucial, but the listing does not specify any evaluation or guardrail frameworks.
Not certain from the listing — While designed for SOX compliance, the agent's own compliance posture (e.g., SOC 2, IAM controls, audit logging of its actions) is not detailed.
Not certain from the listing — It is unclear if Midship interacts with other enterprise agents or operates as a standalone digital worker.
MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).
These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.