AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingPricing

← MoltQuest

MoltQuest — agentic threat model

9.7AIVSS 9.7 · Critical

MoltQuest presents a high-risk profile due to its fully autonomous nature, multi-agent interactions, and direct integration with Web3 wallets (WalletConnect) for real token transactions, making financial theft via prompt injection or logic exploitation a primary threat.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.4AARS uplift 1.3Factor sum 7.4/10Threat ×1.1Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.90
Goal-Driven Planning
0.80
Self-Modification
0.40
Dynamic Tool Use
0.80
Persistent Memory
0.80
Contextual Awareness
0.80
Dynamic Identity
0.50
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.90
Non-Determinism
0.80
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.70

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models✓ mapped

Supports multiple external LLMs (Ollama, Claude, GPT, Mistral). The primary threat is prompt injection or adversarial manipulation of the chosen model, which could alter the agent's logic during high-stakes combat or trading decisions.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The specific data storage and RAG mechanisms for the persistent world state are not detailed, but poisoning the agent's knowledge of the game state or market prices could lead to severe economic exploitation.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

Utilizes the OpenClaw skill pack on ClawHub to orchestrate 31 intention types. Vulnerabilities in the orchestration framework could allow attackers to trigger unauthorized actions, such as unintended asset transfers or malicious crafting commands.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure✓ mapped

Runs as a desktop app (Exuviae) or headless CLI. This local deployment model exposes the host to risks if the agent's code is compromised, potentially leading to the theft of local LLM API keys or wallet credentials stored on the machine.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — While a 3D spectator view and CLI logs provide visual and textual observability, there is no mention of automated guardrails, anomaly detection, or transaction-filtering systems to prevent rogue agent behavior.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)✓ mapped

Integrates WalletConnect for Web3 identity and transaction signing on Base L2. The lack of explicit spending limits, multi-sig requirements, or human-in-the-loop confirmations for autonomous transactions poses a critical security and compliance risk.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

Operates in a persistent multi-agent economy. This environment is highly vulnerable to agent-to-agent trust abuse, market manipulation, collusion, and cascading economic failures if multiple agents are compromised or exploit game-theory loopholes.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.