AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingPricing

← SWE-1 ai coding model

SWE-1 ai coding model — agentic threat model

8.3AIVSS 8.3 · High

SWE-1 presents a high-risk profile due to its deep integration into developer workflows and multi-file editing capabilities, which could be exploited to inject malicious code or backdoors if the agent is compromised or manipulated via prompt injection.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.5AARS uplift 0.77Factor sum 5.1/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×0.9
Autonomy of Action
0.60
Goal-Driven Planning
0.80
Self-Modification
0.20
Dynamic Tool Use
0.70
Persistent Memory
0.50
Contextual Awareness
0.80
Dynamic Identity
0.10
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.30
Non-Determinism
0.60
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.50

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models✓ mapped

SWE-1 is a closed-source model family (SWE-1, lite, mini) with advanced reasoning. Primary threats include model stealing, adversarial prompt injection leading to malicious code generation, and mis-aligned outputs.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — details on training data, vector stores, or RAG mechanisms for project context maintenance are not specified. Threats include project codebase data exfiltration or poisoning of the context window.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

Orchestrates multi-file editing, bug fixing, and tool use. Threats include tool misuse (e.g., executing destructive commands or corrupting files) and insecure tool integration within the developer's local environment.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — hosting, sandboxing of code execution, and secrets management are not detailed. Threats include host compromise if the model executes code locally or in an unsandboxed cloud environment.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability✓ mapped

Features 'Flow Awareness' with a shared timeline for collaboration and continuous improvement. Threats include blind spots in monitoring what code changes the agent proposes or applies, and evaluation gaming.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — no explicit security certifications (like SOC2), compliance alignments, or access control policies are mentioned.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — primarily focuses on human-AI collaboration rather than multi-agent marketplace interactions, though cascading failures could occur if integrated into broader CI/CD pipelines.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.