AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingPricing

← text-remover

text-remover — agentic threat model

7.7AIVSS 7.7 · High

The text-remover agent is a low-risk, single-purpose utility with minimal agentic capabilities, primarily posing traditional web application and media-processing security risks (such as data privacy of uploaded videos and infrastructure vulnerabilities) rather than complex agentic threats.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 7.5AARS uplift 0.17Factor sum 0.7/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.10
Goal-Driven Planning
0.10
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.00
Persistent Memory
0.00
Contextual Awareness
0.10
Dynamic Identity
0.00
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.00
Non-Determinism
0.20
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.20

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely uses specialized computer vision models (e.g., CNNs, GANs, or diffusion-based inpainting) rather than LLMs. Primary threats include adversarial video inputs designed to cause processing failures, and model stealing of proprietary inpainting weights.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — requires video upload, processing, and temporary storage. Key threats include unauthorized access to user-uploaded videos, data leakage, and lack of secure data retention/deletion policies for processed media.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely does not use an agentic orchestration framework, relying instead on a static media processing pipeline. Threats are minimal, primarily involving insecure command execution if wrapping CLI tools like FFmpeg.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — hosted as an online web application. Major threats include server-side resource exhaustion (DoS) via large video uploads, and remote code execution (RCE) via vulnerabilities in video decoding libraries.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — no mention of monitoring or guardrails. Gaps include a lack of automated detection for abusive, illegal, or copyrighted video uploads, and vulnerability to automated scraping/abuse of the freemium tier.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — closed source and freemium model. Threats include potential GDPR/CCPA compliance gaps regarding the processing and storage of personally identifiable information (PII) contained within uploaded videos.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

This is a standalone vertical utility tool with no multi-agent or ecosystem integrations described. Threats of cascading agent failures or agent-to-agent trust abuse are not applicable.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.