← The General Intelligence Company
The General Intelligence Company — agentic threat model
The General Intelligence Company focuses on business automation via 'Digital Workers', which inherently carries high-impact risks due to potential integration with sensitive corporate systems and data, though the lack of technical specifics in the listing limits a definitive security posture assessment.
OWASP AIVSS score rationale
| Autonomy of Action | 0.50 | |
| Goal-Driven Planning | 0.50 | |
| Self-Modification | 0.10 | |
| Dynamic Tool Use | 0.60 | |
| Persistent Memory | 0.40 | |
| Contextual Awareness | 0.50 | |
| Dynamic Identity | 0.20 | |
| Multi-Agent Interactions | 0.30 | |
| Non-Determinism | 0.60 | |
| Opacity & Reflexivity | 0.50 |
Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.
MAESTRO 7-layer threat model
Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.
Not certain from the listing — The specific foundation models powering these digital workers are not disclosed, leaving potential exposure to standard LLM vulnerabilities such as prompt injection, model reprogramming, or misaligned outputs.
Not certain from the listing — The data operations, vector stores, and RAG architectures used to ingest business data are unspecified, presenting risks of data exfiltration or knowledge-base poisoning if left unsecured.
Not certain from the listing — The orchestration framework, memory management, and tool-calling mechanisms for business automation are not described, raising concerns regarding insecure tool integration and unauthorized action execution.
Not certain from the listing — The deployment infrastructure, sandboxing controls, and network isolation measures for hosting these digital workers are unknown, which could lead to host compromise or lateral movement if compromised.
Not certain from the listing — There is no mention of evaluation frameworks, real-time monitoring, logging, or guardrails to detect drift, anomalies, or malicious inputs in production environments.
Not certain from the listing — The listing does not detail any identity management, access controls, policy enforcement, or regulatory compliance alignments (such as SOC2 or ISO 27001) for the automated workflows.
Not certain from the listing — While 'Digital Workers' implies potential multi-agent coordination or integration into broader enterprise ecosystems, the specific interaction protocols and trust boundaries between agents are undefined.
MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).
These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.