Vote-n-Venture — agentic threat model
Vote-n-Venture is a low-to-moderate risk open-source travel planning agent focused on collaborative itinerary generation. Its primary security risks involve prompt injection from group members to manipulate recommendations or exfiltrate shared preferences, with minimal risk of direct financial or physical harm due to its lack of transactional booking capabilities.
OWASP AIVSS score rationale
| Autonomy of Action | 0.20 | |
| Goal-Driven Planning | 0.40 | |
| Self-Modification | 0.00 | |
| Dynamic Tool Use | 0.30 | |
| Persistent Memory | 0.20 | |
| Contextual Awareness | 0.40 | |
| Dynamic Identity | 0.10 | |
| Multi-Agent Interactions | 0.00 | |
| Non-Determinism | 0.50 | |
| Opacity & Reflexivity | 0.30 |
Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.
MAESTRO 7-layer threat model
Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.
Not certain from the listing — likely relies on commercial or open-source foundation models to parse preferences and generate itineraries. Vulnerable to prompt injection where a group member could inject malicious instructions to bias the itinerary or extract other members' private preferences.
Not certain from the listing — processes and aggregates group preferences, links, and travel constraints. Risks include data exfiltration of personal travel preferences and potential data poisoning if malicious links or inputs are supplied by a group participant.
Not certain from the listing — orchestrates the preference-gathering and itinerary-generation workflow. Vulnerabilities could arise from insecure tool integration if it dynamically queries external travel, mapping, or weather APIs without strict input sanitization.
Not certain from the listing — as an open-source project, deployment security depends entirely on the hosting environment. Risks include exposed API keys (e.g., for map or travel services) and lack of isolation between different planning groups if self-hosted insecurely.
Not certain from the listing — no built-in evaluation, guardrails, or logging mechanisms are described. A lack of observability could allow biased recommendations or prompt injection attacks to go undetected by the host.
Not certain from the listing — requires robust authentication and authorization controls to ensure only invited group members can contribute to or view a specific trip's itinerary. No compliance certifications are mentioned.
Not certain from the listing — does not explicitly mention multi-agent orchestration or external agent ecosystem integrations, focusing instead on human-to-agent collaboration.
MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).
These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.