AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingPricing

← Zeta Labs

Zeta Labs — agentic threat model

5.8AIVSS 5.8 · Medium

Zeta Labs is positioned as a closed-source digital worker and AI assistant, but the extremely sparse directory listing provides no details on its architecture, integrations, or security controls, resulting in a highly uncertain risk profile.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 5.0AARS uplift 0.85Factor sum 1.7/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.30
Goal-Driven Planning
0.20
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.20
Persistent Memory
0.10
Contextual Awareness
0.20
Dynamic Identity
0.00
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.00
Non-Determinism
0.30
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.40

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The underlying foundation models are not specified. Standard LLM risks like prompt injection, adversarial examples, and misaligned outputs apply.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — No details are provided regarding data ingestion, RAG, vector databases, or training data pipelines. Standard risks include data exfiltration and knowledge poisoning.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The orchestration framework, memory architecture, and tool-calling mechanisms are undisclosed. Risks include insecure tool execution and memory poisoning.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The hosting environment, sandboxing capabilities, and network security controls are unknown. Standard risks include container escape or unauthorized access to the closed-source hosting infrastructure.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no mention of guardrails, monitoring, logging, or evaluation frameworks to detect drift or malicious inputs.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — No compliance certifications (e.g., SOC2, ISO 27001), identity management, or access control policies are mentioned.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — It is unclear if this digital worker interacts with other agents or operates within a multi-agent marketplace.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.