AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← Aide

Aide — agentic threat model

8.9AIVSS 8.9 · High

Aide presents a high-risk profile due to its deep integration into local developer environments, full codebase access, and multi-agent execution capabilities. While its privacy-first design mitigates some data leakage concerns, the potential for arbitrary code execution and repository compromise remains significant.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.5AARS uplift 0.9Factor sum 6.0/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×0.95
Autonomy of Action
0.60
Goal-Driven Planning
0.80
Self-Modification
0.20
Dynamic Tool Use
0.70
Persistent Memory
0.40
Contextual Awareness
0.90
Dynamic Identity
0.30
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.80
Non-Determinism
0.70
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.60

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely integrates external LLMs or local models for code generation; threats include prompt injection, model misalignment, and adversarial code generation.

L2 · Data Operations✓ mapped

Analyzes the entire local codebase. Threats include data exfiltration of intellectual property, codebase poisoning (malicious code in files influencing RAG/context), and embedding inversion.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

Uses a multi-agent framework for collaborative problem-solving (SWE-bench style). Threats include insecure tool integration (executing generated code, running tests), tool misuse, and framework vulnerabilities.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — as an IDE, it likely runs locally on the developer's machine or in a container. If local, compromise leads to host-level privilege escalation and arbitrary code execution.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — lacks explicit details on runtime guardrails, logging, or anomaly detection for generated code execution.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)✓ mapped

Claims a 'Privacy-First Design' which may restrict telemetry or code exfiltration, but lacks formal compliance certifications (like SOC2) in the listing.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

Features a multi-agent coding framework. Threats include cascading failures between agents, A2A trust abuse, and rogue agent behavior during complex code generation tasks.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).