AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← Aider

Aider — agentic threat model

8.3AIVSS 8.3 · High

Aider presents a significant security risk profile because it operates directly on local filesystems with write permissions and executes git commands, meaning a prompt injection or malicious codebase context could lead to unauthorized code modification, backdoor insertion, or local data exposure.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.4AARS uplift 0.77Factor sum 4.8/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×0.9
Autonomy of Action
0.60
Goal-Driven Planning
0.70
Self-Modification
0.10
Dynamic Tool Use
0.80
Persistent Memory
0.30
Contextual Awareness
0.80
Dynamic Identity
0.20
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.10
Non-Determinism
0.70
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.50

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models✓ mapped

Aider relies on external foundation models like GPT-4 and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. It is vulnerable to indirect prompt injection if it processes untrusted files or pull requests containing adversarial instructions designed to hijack the code generation process.

L2 · Data Operations✓ mapped

Data operations involve reading local git repositories and files. If an attacker poisons the codebase with malicious comments or documentation, they can manipulate the context window to force the agent to exfiltrate data or write insecure code.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

The orchestration framework manages file editing and git commits. Vulnerabilities here include insecure tool integration, where the agent might be tricked into executing arbitrary terminal commands or modifying system files outside the repository scope.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure✓ mapped

Aider runs locally in the user's terminal environment. It lacks built-in sandboxing, meaning any malicious code generated and executed (e.g., during tests or build steps) runs with the full privileges of the local user account.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — there is no mention of built-in guardrails, real-time safety monitoring, or evaluation frameworks to detect and block malicious code generation before it is written to disk.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — as an open-source CLI tool, it does not detail enterprise compliance controls, access policies, or centralized audit logging beyond standard local git commit histories.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

Aider operates primarily as a single-agent CLI tool. There are no explicit multi-agent coordination protocols or marketplace integrations described, minimizing ecosystem-level cascading risks.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).