AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← Browserable

Browserable — agentic threat model

9.2AIVSS 9.2 · Critical

Browserable is a high-risk capability provider that enables AI agents to interact directly with the web, presenting significant risks of prompt-injection-driven tool misuse, session hijacking, and infrastructure compromise if the browser environment is not strictly sandboxed.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.5AARS uplift 0.68Factor sum 4.5/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.70
Goal-Driven Planning
0.40
Self-Modification
0.10
Dynamic Tool Use
0.80
Persistent Memory
0.20
Contextual Awareness
0.50
Dynamic Identity
0.60
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.20
Non-Determinism
0.60
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.40

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Browserable is a library for AI agents and does not bundle a specific foundation model. Threats depend entirely on the orchestrating LLM, which could be vulnerable to prompt injection that forces the browser to perform malicious actions.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The library processes DOM data and session states but does not specify a vector store or training pipeline. Risks include the exfiltration of sensitive data scraped from web pages or session cookies during automation.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

As a browser automation library, it represents a highly powerful tool integration. The primary threat is tool misuse, where an agent is manipulated via indirect prompt injection on a web page to perform unauthorized actions like clicking malicious links or submitting forms.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure✓ mapped

Because it is 'self-hostable', deployment security is critical. Running browser automation (like headless Chrome) introduces severe infrastructure risks, including container escape, SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) via local network navigation, and host compromise.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no mention of built-in guardrails, action logging, or observability features. Without strict monitoring of browser sessions, malicious or anomalous agent behavior on the web may go undetected.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — No security controls, authentication mechanisms, or compliance alignments are detailed. Users must manually implement access controls and secure credential storage for any automated web accounts.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The library does not natively define a multi-agent ecosystem, though agents utilizing it to browse the web could interact with other web-facing agents, potentially leading to cascading trust abuses.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).