AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← Codegen

Codegen — agentic threat model

9.5AIVSS 9.5 · Critical

Codegen presents a high-risk profile due to its write-access capabilities over code repositories and ticketing systems, where a compromise could lead to automated injection of malicious code into software supply chains.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.5AARS uplift 0.99Factor sum 6.0/10Threat ×1.1Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.80
Goal-Driven Planning
0.80
Self-Modification
0.20
Dynamic Tool Use
0.80
Persistent Memory
0.50
Contextual Awareness
0.80
Dynamic Identity
0.60
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.20
Non-Determinism
0.70
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.60

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely relies on advanced third-party LLMs optimized for code generation. Key threats include prompt injection that bypasses safety alignment to generate malicious code or backdoors.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — requires ingestion of proprietary codebases and ticket history. Threats include codebase poisoning, where malicious code in the repository influences future generation, and exfiltration of intellectual property.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — orchestrates multi-step planning to resolve tickets. Insecure tool integration (e.g., git, compilers, test runners) could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands via manipulated ticket inputs.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — executing and testing generated code requires highly secure, isolated sandbox environments to prevent container escape, lateral network movement, or host compromise.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — requires strict observability and guardrails to detect anomalous code generation patterns or unauthorized repository modifications before they are committed.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — demands robust identity and access management (IAM) to limit the agent's repository permissions (e.g., branch protection, mandatory human approval for PR merges).

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — potential integration with developer ecosystems, CI/CD pipelines, and third-party APIs, introducing risks of cascading supply chain vulnerabilities.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).