AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← defense-in-depth

defense-in-depth — agentic threat model

1.4AIVSS 1.4 · Low

This agent is an instruction-driven design skill focused on defensive programming and layered validation, presenting a very low agentic risk posture as it lacks direct execution capabilities, tool access, or autonomous decision-making.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 1.5AARS uplift 0.46Factor sum 0.6/10Threat ×0.9Mitigation ×0.7
Autonomy of Action
0.00
Goal-Driven Planning
0.10
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.00
Persistent Memory
0.00
Contextual Awareness
0.20
Dynamic Identity
0.00
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.00
Non-Determinism
0.20
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.10

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The agent is an instruction-driven skill rather than a specific model. It relies on the host foundation model to interpret and apply its layered validation instructions, making it susceptible to model-level prompt injection or misalignment if the underlying model fails to follow instructions.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no mention of dedicated data operations, vector stores, or RAG pipelines. It acts purely as a set of design instructions, meaning data poisoning or exfiltration risks depend entirely on the host system implementing this skill.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

The skill directly addresses agent framework security by instructing the orchestrator to implement layered validation and fail-safe designs, reducing the risk of tool misuse and framework-level vulnerabilities through structured error-handling.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — As an open-source community skill, it does not specify deployment infrastructure, sandboxing, or hosting environments. Infrastructure security is entirely dependent on the user's deployment environment.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability✓ mapped

The skill inherently supports observability by advocating for multiple error-handling layers, which typically generate structured logs and validation failures, reducing blind spots during execution.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)✓ mapped

The skill aligns with security-by-design principles (such as OWASP and NIST frameworks) by enforcing defense-in-depth validation patterns, though it does not provide built-in identity, authorization, or compliance auditing mechanisms.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no indication of multi-agent coordination or marketplace interactions. However, if integrated into a multi-agent system, its validation instructions could help prevent cascading failures across agent boundaries.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).