AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← DevOpsGPT

DevOpsGPT — agentic threat model

9.6AIVSS 9.6 · Critical

DevOpsGPT presents a high-risk profile due to its integration with software development lifecycles, where unauthorized code execution, repository compromise, or credential exfiltration could occur if the agent is manipulated.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.5AARS uplift 1.06Factor sum 6.4/10Threat ×1.1Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.80
Goal-Driven Planning
0.80
Self-Modification
0.30
Dynamic Tool Use
0.80
Persistent Memory
0.50
Contextual Awareness
0.70
Dynamic Identity
0.60
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.50
Non-Determinism
0.80
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.60

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely relies on third-party LLMs for code generation and planning, exposing it to prompt injection that could lead to the generation of malicious code or backdoor insertion.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — requires access to proprietary codebases and repositories, presenting risks of sensitive data exfiltration or codebase poisoning if malicious inputs are ingested.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — orchestrates multi-step software engineering workflows. Vulnerable to tool misuse, particularly if the agent executes generated code or test suites without strict validation.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — requires a execution environment to run and test code. Without strict sandboxing (e.g., isolated Docker containers), executing untrusted code could lead to host compromise.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — lacks detailed observability specifications. Gaps in monitoring agent-generated commits or pipeline executions could allow malicious changes to bypass detection.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — requires access tokens for Git repositories and CI/CD pipelines. Insecure storage of these secrets poses a significant risk of privilege escalation and unauthorized repository access.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — may interact with external package managers or other developer agents, introducing risks of dependency confusion or cascading failures across the development ecosystem.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).