AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← DevOpsGPT

DevOpsGPT — agentic threat model

9.4AIVSS 9.4 · Critical

DevOpsGPT presents a high agentic risk due to its integration with DevOps tools and code generation capabilities, which could lead to automated supply chain attacks, unauthorized code execution, or repository compromise if the agent is manipulated.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.5AARS uplift 0.9Factor sum 5.7/10Threat ×1.05Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.70
Goal-Driven Planning
0.80
Self-Modification
0.20
Dynamic Tool Use
0.80
Persistent Memory
0.50
Contextual Awareness
0.70
Dynamic Identity
0.40
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.20
Non-Determinism
0.80
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.60

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — the specific LLMs utilized are not disclosed. However, the model is highly susceptible to prompt injection and adversarial requirements designed to generate malicious code or bypass safety alignment.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — the data operations, vector stores, and RAG mechanisms for requirements gathering are not detailed. There is a risk of requirements poisoning where malicious specifications lead to backdoored code generation.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

DevOpsGPT integrates directly with DevOps tools to convert requirements into working software. This orchestration introduces severe risks of tool misuse, such as executing arbitrary shell commands or deploying malicious code via automated CI/CD pipelines.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — there is no mention of sandboxing, containerization, or secure execution environments for compiling and running the generated code, which could lead to host compromise if malicious code is executed.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — no evaluation, monitoring, or guardrail mechanisms are described to detect anomalous agent behavior or verify the safety of generated code before deployment.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — the description lacks details on identity management, authorization, secrets management (e.g., API keys for DevOps tools), or compliance with security standards.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — while it mentions scalability and enterprise automation, it does not explicitly detail multi-agent coordination or ecosystem-level trust boundaries.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).