AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← Eclat Institute

Eclat Institute — agentic threat model

5.4AIVSS 5.4 · Medium

The Eclat Institute agent presents a low overall risk profile, primarily acting as an educational tutor for math and science. Key risks are limited to data privacy concerns regarding student progress and potential prompt injections leading to inaccurate or inappropriate educational content.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 4.3AARS uplift 1.08Factor sum 2.0/10Threat ×0.95Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.10
Goal-Driven Planning
0.20
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.10
Persistent Memory
0.40
Contextual Awareness
0.30
Dynamic Identity
0.00
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.10
Non-Determinism
0.50
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.30

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely relies on standard commercial or open-source LLMs tuned for mathematics and science tutoring. Primary threats include prompt injection leading to inappropriate content generation for students or model hallucination of incorrect academic facts.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely utilizes a vector database or structured knowledge base containing math/science curricula and practice questions. Threats include data poisoning of the curriculum or unauthorized exfiltration of student performance data.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — as an open-source framework, it may orchestrate tutoring workflows. Threats include insecure tool integration if it executes code (e.g., Python interpreter for solving math equations) without proper sandboxing.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely hosted on standard cloud infrastructure or run locally by users. Threats include typical web application vulnerabilities, insecure API endpoints, and lack of isolation if running user-generated code.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — requires robust monitoring to ensure educational content remains accurate and age-appropriate. Gaps here could lead to undetected drift or toxic outputs reaching student users.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — must comply with student data privacy regulations (e.g., COPPA, GDPR) if handling minors' data. Lack of explicit access controls or audit logs poses compliance risks.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely operates as a standalone educational agent with minimal multi-agent or marketplace interactions, presenting low ecosystem-level risk.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).