AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingRuntimePricing

← Huobidex

Huobidex — agentic threat model

4.9AIVSS 4.9 · Medium

Huobidex is a human-curated web directory with zero agentic capabilities, presenting no AI-specific security risks. Its threat profile is entirely limited to traditional web application vulnerabilities, such as malicious link submissions or database injection.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 6.1AARS uplift 0.0Factor sum 0.0/10Threat ×0.9Mitigation ×0.8
Autonomy of Action
0.00
Goal-Driven Planning
0.00
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.00
Persistent Memory
0.00
Contextual Awareness
0.00
Dynamic Identity
0.00
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.00
Non-Determinism
0.00
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.00

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models✓ mapped

The system does not utilize any foundation models or perform model inference, eliminating model-specific threats like adversarial prompt injection, model stealing, or data poisoning.

L2 · Data Operations✓ mapped

Data operations are limited to a standard database storing user-submitted tool names, URLs, and descriptions. The primary threat is database poisoning or malicious URL submission (XSS/phishing links) rather than vector store or embedding attacks.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

No agentic orchestration framework, memory systems, or tool-calling mechanisms are implemented, removing risks associated with insecure tool integration or autonomous execution.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure✓ mapped

Hosted as a standard server-rendered Next.js website behind HTTPS. Standard web infrastructure threats apply (e.g., server compromise, DDoS, dependency vulnerabilities), but there is no AI sandbox or runtime environment to secure.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability✓ mapped

No AI-specific evaluation or guardrails are present. Quality control relies entirely on a human editorial review queue for maker-submitted products before publication.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — standard web security practices (like input sanitization, CSRF protection, and access controls for editors) are assumed but not detailed. Compliance is limited to standard web data privacy regulations.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

The system does not participate in any multi-agent ecosystem or marketplace interactions, eliminating risks of cascading agent failures or autonomous trust abuse.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology — every score is re-derived by the same automated method as an agent's public evidence changes.