AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingRuntimePricing

← IELTS Writing Checker

IELTS Writing Checker — agentic threat model

5.0AIVSS 5.0 · Medium

The IELTS Writing Checker is a low-risk, single-purpose educational agent that operates primarily as a stateless text analyzer with minimal autonomy or external tool access.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 4.3AARS uplift 0.72Factor sum 1.4/10Threat ×0.9Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.10
Goal-Driven Planning
0.10
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.00
Persistent Memory
0.20
Contextual Awareness
0.30
Dynamic Identity
0.00
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.00
Non-Determinism
0.40
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.30

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — relies on an unspecified foundation model to evaluate essays and generate band scores. Vulnerable to prompt injection where a user could manipulate the model to output a perfect score regardless of essay quality.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely processes user-submitted essays in a stateless manner, but may store submissions for model fine-tuning. Risks include potential exposure of personally identifiable information (PII) if users include sensitive data in their essays.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — orchestration appears limited to a simple input-output pipeline (essay submission to feedback generation) with no complex tool-calling or planning frameworks visible.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — hosted as a closed-source web application. Standard web application vulnerabilities apply, but the lack of execution environments or system-level tools minimizes infrastructure breakout risks.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — requires monitoring to ensure the consistency of band score predictions and to detect drift in evaluation criteria over time, but no specific observability stack is mentioned.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — as a freemium educational tool, it likely lacks robust enterprise compliance certifications (e.g., SOC2). Compliance risks are low unless handling student records subject to regional privacy laws.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — operates as an isolated, vertical application with no multi-agent coordination or ecosystem integrations described.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology — every score is re-derived by the same automated method as an agent's public evidence changes.