AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingRuntimePricing

← List Bulb

List Bulb — agentic threat model

4.7AIVSS 4.7 · Medium

List Bulb is a static directory and discovery platform with minimal agentic capabilities, presenting a very low risk profile focused primarily on web-based submission handling rather than autonomous execution.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 4.3AARS uplift 0.41Factor sum 0.8/10Threat ×0.9Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.10
Goal-Driven Planning
0.00
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.10
Persistent Memory
0.10
Contextual Awareness
0.20
Dynamic Identity
0.00
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.00
Non-Determinism
0.20
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.10

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The specific foundation models used to categorize or curate submissions are not disclosed. Standard risks like prompt injection during submission processing could theoretically lead to misaligned categorization.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The directory relies on a database of submitted AI tools and links. The primary threat is data poisoning via malicious submissions designed to inject spam or SEO-manipulating backlinks.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no evidence of an active agentic framework or complex orchestration. Risks are limited to basic input validation of the tool submission form.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Standard web hosting infrastructure is assumed. Threats include typical web application vulnerabilities, server misconfigurations, and lack of isolation for submission processing.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — It is unclear if automated content moderation or evaluation guardrails are in place to filter out malicious URLs or spam submissions before they are published.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Access controls and submission verification mechanisms are not detailed. The platform requires robust moderation workflows to prevent SEO abuse and malicious link injection.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The platform operates as a static directory and does not participate in a multi-agent ecosystem or execute autonomous agent-to-agent interactions.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology — every score is re-derived by the same automated method as an agent's public evidence changes.