AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingRuntimePricing

← Omni Video AI

Omni Video AI — agentic threat model

5.6AIVSS 5.6 · Medium

Omni Video AI is a low-risk, content-generation agent with minimal autonomy, acting primarily as a deterministic pipeline for text-to-video generation. Its primary security risks are concentrated in model-level manipulation and potential intellectual property or content policy violations rather than systemic infrastructure compromise.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 4.3AARS uplift 1.3Factor sum 2.4/10Threat ×0.95Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.10
Goal-Driven Planning
0.10
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.20
Persistent Memory
0.20
Contextual Awareness
0.30
Dynamic Identity
0.00
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.00
Non-Determinism
0.80
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.70

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models✓ mapped

Utilizes Google's Gemini Omni Video model alongside Seedance, Sora, Veo, and Nano Banana. Highly vulnerable to prompt injection designed to bypass safety filters, generating deepfakes, or producing copyrighted/NSFW content.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely processes user-uploaded reference images and text prompts. Risks include potential data exfiltration via prompt injection or poisoning of downstream generation caches if user assets are stored.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — orchestration appears limited to a basic web-to-model pipeline. Risks include insecure tool integration if the API allows arbitrary parameters to be passed directly to the underlying video generation engines.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — hosted as a web platform with API access. Standard web application vulnerabilities apply, such as unauthorized API usage, credit exhaustion/denial of service, and lack of sandboxing for media rendering.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — requires robust input/output guardrails to detect and block malicious prompts or the generation of harmful, abusive, or copyrighted synthetic media before delivery to the user.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — requires compliance with copyright laws, synthetic media labeling regulations (e.g., EU AI Act watermarking), and basic user authentication/authorization for credit management.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — operates as a standalone horizontal content creation tool with no explicit multi-agent coordination or marketplace ecosystem described.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology — every score is re-derived by the same automated method as an agent's public evidence changes.