AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← Omni Video

Omni Video — agentic threat model

6.1AIVSS 6.1 · Medium

Omni Video is a low-autonomy generative AI tool focused on text/image-to-video conversion. Its primary security risks reside in model opacity, potential generation of harmful/misaligned content, and infrastructure abuse (GPU resource theft), rather than agentic execution or systemic privilege escalation.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 5.3AARS uplift 0.8Factor sum 1.7/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.10
Goal-Driven Planning
0.00
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.00
Persistent Memory
0.00
Contextual Awareness
0.10
Dynamic Identity
0.00
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.00
Non-Determinism
0.70
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.80

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models✓ mapped

Uses a proprietary, closed-source next-generation AI video model. Primary threats include adversarial prompt injection to bypass safety filters, model stealing/reverse-engineering of the proprietary weights, and the generation of misaligned, offensive, or copyright-infringing outputs.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — the data pipeline for user-uploaded images and training datasets is not described. Potential threats include data exfiltration of user-uploaded source images, lack of data lineage/provenance for training data, and potential poisoning of future model iterations if user inputs are used for fine-tuning.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Omni Video appears to operate as a direct inference pipeline rather than a complex agentic framework. There is no evidence of tool calling, planning loops, or memory orchestration that would introduce classic agent framework vulnerabilities.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — hosting and infrastructure details are undisclosed. Standard cloud hosting threats apply, specifically GPU resource exhaustion/denial of service due to the high computational cost of video generation, and potential container escape if user-uploaded assets are processed insecurely.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — there is no mention of automated content moderation, output guardrails, or logging mechanisms to detect and block the generation of deepfakes, NSFW content, or misinformation.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — no compliance certifications (e.g., SOC2, ISO 27001), data privacy policies (GDPR/CCPA), or identity governance controls are specified for the platform.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — the tool operates as a standalone horizontal application with no described multi-agent interactions, marketplace integrations, or agent-to-agent communication protocols.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).