AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingRuntimePricing

← OmniRoute

OmniRoute — agentic threat model

8.5AIVSS 8.5 · High

OmniRoute acts as a high-exposure AI gateway and routing layer rather than an autonomous agent, presenting low direct agentic risk but high systemic risk due to credential aggregation and fallback routing across 237+ providers.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.5AARS uplift 0.4Factor sum 2.4/10Threat ×1.1Mitigation ×0.95
Autonomy of Action
0.10
Goal-Driven Planning
0.10
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.40
Persistent Memory
0.10
Contextual Awareness
0.30
Dynamic Identity
0.80
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.20
Non-Determinism
0.20
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.20

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — OmniRoute does not host models but routes to 237+ external foundation models; threats include downstream model poisoning, adversarial prompt injection bypasses, and model-specific vulnerabilities across the diverse set of integrated providers.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The gateway handles transient prompt/response payloads but does not explicitly mention persistent vector databases or RAG pipelines; primary threats are data exfiltration or logging of sensitive API payloads.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

Standardized routing is provided for external agent frameworks like Claude Code, Cursor, and Cline. The gateway itself does not execute agentic planning loops, but insecure tool integration or manipulation of fallback routing rules could lead to unexpected downstream agent behavior.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure✓ mapped

As an open-source gateway managing API keys for 237+ providers, the infrastructure layer is highly critical. Threats include API key theft from memory, container compromise, and man-in-the-middle attacks on routed traffic.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability✓ mapped

The listing explicitly mentions centralized monitoring. Threats include logging sensitive API keys or PII in transit, and blind spots in monitoring if fallback mechanisms fail silently or route to malicious endpoints.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — While it simplifies API management, there is no explicit mention of built-in role-based access control (RBAC), rate limiting, or compliance certifications (like SOC2) for the gateway itself.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

OmniRoute sits at the center of a massive multi-provider ecosystem. A compromise of the gateway allows cascading failures, provider impersonation, and unauthorized cross-agent communication across different client applications like Cursor and Cline.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology — every score is re-derived by the same automated method as an agent's public evidence changes.