AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← PraisonAI

PraisonAI — agentic threat model

9.5AIVSS 9.5 · Critical

PraisonAI is a highly flexible, open-source multi-agent framework integrating AutoGen and CrewAI with deep codebase access. Its primary security risks stem from the orchestration of multiple autonomous agents with access to sensitive code repositories, lacking built-in sandboxing or guardrails in its default configuration.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.5AARS uplift 1.02Factor sum 6.5/10Threat ×1.05Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.70
Goal-Driven Planning
0.80
Self-Modification
0.30
Dynamic Tool Use
0.70
Persistent Memory
0.50
Contextual Awareness
0.80
Dynamic Identity
0.40
Multi-Agent Interactions
1.00
Non-Determinism
0.70
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.60

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models✓ mapped

Supports 100+ LLMs, inheriting model-level vulnerabilities such as prompt injection, adversarial reprogramming, and misaligned outputs across a diverse set of foundation models.

L2 · Data Operations✓ mapped

Interacts directly with entire codebases, presenting significant risks of codebase data exfiltration, source code poisoning, and unauthorized access to intellectual property if malicious prompts are processed.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

Combines AutoGen and CrewAI frameworks to orchestrate multi-agent systems. Vulnerabilities include insecure tool integration, framework-level execution bugs, and malicious tool misuse during task execution.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — as an open-source framework, deployment and infrastructure security (such as container sandboxing, secrets management, and network isolation) are entirely dependent on the user's self-hosted environment.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — there is no explicit mention of built-in evaluation, logging, or guardrail mechanisms to monitor agent behavior or detect anomalous multi-agent interactions.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — being a free, open-source technology framework, it lacks native compliance certifications (e.g., SOC2, ISO) or centralized identity and access management policies.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

Designed specifically for multi-agent collaboration, creating a high risk of agent-to-agent trust abuse, cascading failures, and rogue agent behavior where one compromised agent compromises the entire swarm.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).