AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← Raccoon AI

Raccoon AI — agentic threat model

8.6AIVSS 8.6 · High

Raccoon AI presents a high-risk profile due to its ability to execute authenticated actions across arbitrary web applications using managed stealth browsers. The combination of credential delegation and dynamic web automation significantly amplifies the impact of potential prompt injection or session hijacking.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.8AARS uplift 0.73Factor sum 5.5/10Threat ×1.1Mitigation ×0.9
Autonomy of Action
0.80
Goal-Driven Planning
0.70
Self-Modification
0.20
Dynamic Tool Use
0.90
Persistent Memory
0.30
Contextual Awareness
0.60
Dynamic Identity
0.90
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.10
Non-Determinism
0.50
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.50

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The specific LLMs or foundation models driving the automation decisions are not disclosed. Threats include prompt injection leading to unintended browser actions or unauthorized data extraction.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — While the agent extracts data and inputs it into CRMs or Sheets, the underlying data storage, vector databases, or caching mechanisms for these workflows are not detailed.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

The platform orchestrates custom automation workflows using Playwright, Puppeteer, and Selenium. The primary threat is insecure tool integration or prompt injection exploiting the browser automation framework to perform unauthorized actions on target websites.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure✓ mapped

The agent runs on 'managed cloud browsers built for stealth'. This infrastructure faces threats of container escape, IP reputation abuse, and session hijacking if the browser environments are not strictly sandboxed and isolated per user.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no mention of built-in guardrails, real-time monitoring, or logging mechanisms to detect and prevent malicious or anomalous browser automation behavior.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The platform claims to 'securely link and manage access of your end user accounts', implying credential/token management, but specific compliance standards (e.g., SOC 2) or encryption protocols are not detailed.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no explicit mention of multi-agent coordination or marketplace integrations, though the agent acts as an intermediary across the broader internet ecosystem.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).