AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← Voe Ai

Voe Ai — agentic threat model

6.1AIVSS 6.1 · Medium

Voe Ai is a low-autonomy generative video agent with minimal systemic risk, primarily vulnerable to prompt injection for safety filter bypass (e.g., deepfakes, copyright violations) and API abuse rather than autonomous execution threats.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 5.0AARS uplift 1.1Factor sum 2.2/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.10
Goal-Driven Planning
0.10
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.00
Persistent Memory
0.20
Contextual Awareness
0.30
Dynamic Identity
0.00
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.00
Non-Determinism
0.70
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.80

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models✓ mapped

Powered by the Veo 3.1 foundation model. Primary threats include adversarial prompt injections designed to bypass safety filters to generate deepfakes, misinformation, or copyrighted content, as well as model evasion/reprogramming.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The agent processes user-provided text prompts, reference images, and keyframes. Threats include data exfiltration of proprietary creative assets and potential data poisoning if user uploads are used for downstream fine-tuning or style locking.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Orchestration involves prompt adherence, style locking, and multi-layer audio synchronization. Threats include insecure handling of state during shot extension/remixing and parameter manipulation in the API.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Video rendering is computationally intensive. Threats include GPU resource exhaustion (denial of service) attacks via complex rendering requests and insecure API endpoints exposing the underlying generation pipeline.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Requires robust automated content moderation to detect and block harmful video generation. Threats include evaluation gaming where users subtly alter prompts to bypass visual safety guardrails.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — As a paid API, it requires strong authentication, rate limiting, and billing controls. Compliance threats include intellectual property disputes over generated training data and alignment with emerging synthetic media regulations.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — If integrated into larger automated marketing or content pipelines, threats include downstream abuse where malicious agents autonomously call this API to generate mass disinformation campaigns.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).